Skip to main content

Scientific Theories are mere speculations : exposing flaws of Big Bang and STR

Analysis of Big Bang Theory                                                                                                                                      Singularity means all the matter of Cosmos was concentrated at one location in a size of a ball and there was almost no space in- between. The Big Bang can explain formation of clusters, galaxies, stars and planets. Now the question arises how Space entered between Molecules, between Atoms and within Atoms between micro-particles when there was a Singularity meaning no space in between at the beginning?                                                                                                             Either we suppose that explosions continued till Molecules got separated from Molecules, Atoms got separated from Atoms and micro-particles got separated from micro-particles.                                                                                                                                                        Or the arms of Galaxies suggest to me that initially Matter was in a form of Ocean of primary particles with Space in between these particles and it was churned and so the spinning Galaxies came out of it.                             

Why modern Science negates Absolute Space and Absolute Time?                                                                                            The Copernican System of Earth’s motion round the Sun is one of the basic assertion of Science and it remained main tussle between Science and Church and finally Church withdrew and Science became the name of  Truth  and reason.                                                                                                                                                        Michelson Morley Experiment was performed in 1881. If Earth is getting displaced with velocity of 30 Km/Second in Absolute Space then the fringes of interferometer should have been shifted on changing the direction of its arms. The NULL result of Michelson Morley Experiment shook this very foundation of Modern Science. The Michelson Morley Experiment by its NULL result shook the very foundation of Copernican system. It is not Aether that was refuted; it was displacement of Earth in Absolute Space that was refuted. It means Earth is not getting displaced with respect to Absolute Space.                                                                                                                                                  Reasons for acceptance of Lorentz contraction and Special Theory of Relativity by early 20th Century Physics                                                                                                                                                                                    The Paradox of The Null result of Michelson-Morley Experiment (MMX) compelled Physics of Early 20th Century to accept the logic of Special theory of Relativity. The null result of MMX was a great dilemma as it refuted motion of Earth in Absolute Space. This inference was either not comprehended or not acknowledged publicly and MMX was  presented as refutation of Aether. The STR was a step ahead of Lorentz Contraction by making all experimental verifications of Lorentz Contraction physically impossible by its logic. Lorentz contraction says that distances get contracted in the direction perpendicular to the direction of motion. The STR makes it unverifiable by saying that rulers are also contracted and so one cannot measure and time also slows so one cannot compute the distance indirectly and clocks also get dissynchronized and so one cannot know slowness of time.                                                                                                                                                        The 20th Century Physics shaken by NULL result of MMX found saviour in STR.                                                                         The acceptance of STR opened the Pandora’s box of all wild inferences.                                                                                    The NULL result of Michelson-Morley Experiment is a fact while Special theory of Relativity is just a human speculation to explain it.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 The Logic of STR is fallacious in its Derivations and in its Assumptions as shown below:                                                        

  1-Logic of Special Theory of Relativity                                                                                                                                                        The logic of STR can be presented in simple way as following:                                                                                                         Let there be just two frames of References:                                                                                                                                1.Moving frame F1, moving with relativistic velocity Vf1. Suppose it is a carriage with a lamp at floor and a mirror on ceiling, just above and in line with lamp at floor.                                                                                                             The height of carriage be H. The velocity of light be C                                                                                                       2.  Other frame F2that is stationary relative to Moving frame F1.                                                                                                  Now, a beam of light travels straight from lamp at floor, strikes the mirror at ceiling and returns to floor in the moving carriage F1.                                                                                                                                                                                              This is an Event in moving frame F1.                                                                                                                                                                                                                        The path of beam of Light is H distance up and H distance down. And total time T1 will be 2H/C in moving carriage.                                                                                                                                                                                                                The STR derives from this that time T1 for this Event in moving carriage F1 will be 2H/C and in other frame F2 stationary with respect to moving frame, using Pythagorean theorem, the Time T2  will be 2H/C*1/⎭1- Vf12/C2                                                                                                                                                                                                 Thus T2= T1/⎭1- Vf12/C2                                                                                                                                                                                 (here symbol  ⎭  denotes square root of succeeding terms)                                                                                        According to S.T.R., this difference in Time T1 in F1 and T2 in F2 is real. It was concluded that Time T1 in moving frame F1 moves slower as it is less than Time T2 calculated for F2 as described.                                                                                                                                                                              The people were led to believe that one Twin in a space ship moving on with relativistic velocity (F1) would remain younger than the other one on Earth (F2).                                                                                                                                     2-Fallacy of Derivations                                                                                                                                                                  The Time T1 in moving frame F1 as shown in above formula of STR does not depend on its Velocity Vf1 of moving frame but it depends on height of carriage. The speed of Light C itself is considered constant. Hence if we go on increasing or decreasing the velocity of moving frame Vf1, then its Time T1 will not decrease or increase as per above formula as it does not consist of Vf1. The distance and time in moving frame F1 depends upon height of carriage. Thus twin in moving frame F1 is not going to be younger by increasing velocity Vf1 of moving frame, because the Time T1 is independent of Vf1.                                                                                                        Instead, according to above logic, the Time T2 in frame F2 will increase or decrease with increase or decrease in velocity Vf1 of moving frame F1 as shown by formula of STR for T2. Thus according to logic of STR, the twin in stationary frame F2 will be younger or older on decreasing or increasing the velocity Vf1 of moving frame F1.                                                             This miracle may be accepted if there be only just these two frames F1 and F2 in Cosmos. There are infinite numbers of moving frames F1 F3 F4 F5 F6 …… Fn with different velocities Vf1 Vf3 Vf4 Vf5 Vf6 …… Vfn.  As Time T2 in frame F2 will be affected, according to STR, by different Velocities of all remaining frames F1 F3 F4 F5 F6 Fn moving relative to F2, it is illogical and impossible to base Time T2 in one frame F2 on velocities of rest of other moving frames.                                                                                                                                                                                                     3-Fallacy of Assumptions                                                                                                                                                                   The assumption that path of beam of light striking the overhead mirror in a  moving frame will be straight is itself fallacious as shown here by some further refinements in our Imaginary Experiment.                                                                                                                                                                 Here the roof of carriage is transparent. Our lamp is capable of emitting just single Photon (or any micro-particle) detectable by one Observer at the place of mirror and by one Observer in outer space in helicopter in line with lamp and inner observer.                                                                                                                                                     Initially all the three- lamp, inner observer and outer observer are in a line. The lamp emits the single light-particle up.                                                                                                                                                                                                          As soon as single light-particle is emitted, it goes straight up towards roof and in the meantime, our inner observer (mirror) is shifted to a distance H* Vf1/C. Thus single light-particle  will not strike the inner observer (mirror), instead  it will cross the transparent roof almost un-deflected and will be detected by outside observer.  Here it is understood that observer in helicopter stays where it is in the beginning and that the beams of Light are not deflected by velocity of moving frame .   All confusion was due to considering beam of light as such and applying our day to day experience to special case of motion at relativistic speed.                                                                                                                                                              Thus straight beam of light will not strike the mirror in carriage moving with relativistic velocity, only oblique beam of light will strike the mirror in carriage moving with relativistic velocity and this time T1 will also be 2H/C*⎭1- Vf12/C2 and not 2H/C for such oblique beams.                                                                                                                                      We must not assume that micro-particles or beam of light and X-rays get deflected by movement of frame   to the same extent as macro-particles, bullet or ball, get deflected in a moving frame.                                                                                                                                                                        If beam of Light start getting affected by velocity of moving frame as macro-particles, bullet or ball, are affected then-                                                                                                                                                                                                    1. Speed of moving bodies will be added to speed of Light                                                                                                                     2. We will not be able to see objects moving away from us in one direction, as all the beams of Light will get deflected away from us in that direction.                                                                                                                                              New Explanation                                                                                                                                                                                            But there is a geo-specific solution to this paradox of null result of Michelson Morley experiment, not thought of 100 years ago.                                                                                                                                                                                We hold a Special Clock with a single needle moving per Second. This needle moves with respect to numbers on dial and also moves with respect to its centre of attachment. This needle is also getting displaced with respect to outside objects too.

Now we will move the whole clock anti-clockwise so that needle always
remains aligned to some outside object (say, the Ceiling Fan).                                                                                  Now this needle is moving with respect to numbers on dial and its centre as before but remains un-displaced with respect to outside objects such as Ceiling Fan.
If there be a mini - observatory and a mini-laboratory on this needle then we will
record observational proof of displacement with respect to number on dials and its centre of attachment but we will record NULL result in Experiments devised to detect its displacement, because needle remains un-displaced with respect to outside Space. Here we can take the Clock as representing the Cosmos. The Ceiling Fan represents a fixed point in Absolute Space/ Extra-cosmic Space. On this analogy, we may understand that Earth is getting displaced with respect to Stars and Sun but remains un-displaced in Absolute Space.                                                                                                                                                Thus we can detect whether any moving body is getting displaced with respect to points of Extra-cosmic space or not by Michelson Morley Experiment. The NULL result of Michelson-Morley Experiment signifies non-displacement of moving frame, Earth, with respect to points in Extra-cosmic space/Absolute Space.                                                                                                                   The displacement due to Diurnal motion (Rotation) of Earth on its axis is experimentally detectable,  as  by Foucault  pendulum  but  displacement  of  Earth  due  to  Annual motion(Revolution), approx.30 Km/Sec, with respect to Sun and stars is experimentally not detected so far. The Displacement due to this motion may be effectively countered by simultaneous reverse motion at different Gravitational levels -Sun, Galaxy, Local Group and Higher level.                                                                                                                                                          Thus according to model presented here, Earth remains un-displaced despite its motion with respect to Sun and Stars because of simultaneous motion of Sun, Galaxy, Local Group and some relevant portion or whole of Cosmos in reverse.                                                                                                                                                                          This explains plenty of Observational proofs of Earth’s motion with respect to Sun and Stars but no experiment to detect its displacement because Earth remains where it is despite its motion with respect to Sun and Stars and therefore we have NULL result of Michelson-Morley Experiment when performed on surface of Earth. All the points of Earth occupy same points of Absolute Space except some displacement due to rotation on its axis in 24 hours that is not appreciable to affect the fringes of Michelson Morley Interferometer.                                                                                                                                                                                                        Question is whether this Paradox of Experimental NULL result is a
GENERAL PHENOMENON or a GEO-SPECIFIC PHENOMENON.                                                                                    Michelson-Morley Experiments when performed on other Cosmic Bodies, such as on surface of Moon will settle the issue.                                                                                                                                                            

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gender bias in our language and thinking

Viewing things either as male or as female has distorted our perceptions. Only some living things are male and female and even such things require gender free word most of the times. For example a human being needs to be addressed by some common word but the common word ‘man’ has been taken by male of the species. The male has penis and female has womb- so woman is correct word for female of human species and accordingly male of human species must be called ‘peman’ while man should be used where there is no need to express gender. At microscopic level, the female gamete remains at one place and male gamete reaches it and gets attached. 1. Most harm has caused to our thinking and feelings by understanding God in male image. 2. Many things having nothing to do with sex dichotomy are understood as male or female- for example in Hindi palang is masculine while kursi and mez are feminine. 3. Even our emotions are treated as masculine or feminine for example pyaar is masculine and muhabbat ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Flood of anti-God and anti-Religion videos on You Tube

Nowadays, posting videos on You Tube are the main instrument of influencing others. There were days when in my adolescence I took the side of Science against Religion. But when we see the human history and see the political conditions of modern times then we see subjugation, exploitation and injustices all around and in the past. The same people who preached Religion and Spiritualism to dominate and rule over others are now preaching Atheism and materialism and consumerism for that very purpose. Those who believe in Human Equality and in Brotherhood and Sisterhood of whole mankind must unite and must stand and fight those who are enemies of Human Equality and Human brother/sisterhood. Everywhere fascists have ascended to power and those who believe in Humanity have become weak though 80 percent World needs active intervention to attain freedom and equality. The people who believe in Humanity they must come forward and lead and guide those 80 percent people.
Post a Comment
Read more

स्त्री और पुरुष के वक़्त के साथ बदलते रिश्ते

पुरुष के लिए स्त्री का साथ बहुत ज़रूरी है और कई पुरुष पत्नी की मृत्यु के बाद ज़िंदा नहीं रह पाते लेकिन अगर वे तुरंत दूसरी जीवन साथी खोज पाते तो लम्बी उम्र ज़िंदा रहते। सती प्रथा तो पहले होती थी पर आज बेटे बहू बेटी दामाद माँ की मृत्यु के बाद यही चाहते हैं कि उनका बाप विधवा जीवन जिए। ऐसे ही वे नासमझ स्त्री पुरुष हैं जिनकी उम्र गुज़रती जा रही है और बिन ब्याहे बैठे हैं और वह भी जो तलाक़ या जीवन साथी की मृत्यु के बाद जल्दी से दूसरा जीवन साथी नहीं ढूंढ लेते हैं। पर एक बहुत बड़ी तादाद उन मर्दों और औरतों की भी है जो नापसंद रिश्तों का बोझ उठाये हुए हैं और जिनकी तमन्ना है काश उनकी ज़िन्दगी में बहार फिर से आये - शरीयत इजाज़त देती है पर समाज और हुकूमत सिपर लिए खड़े हैं। बच्चों की खातिर नापसंद रिश्ते को निभाना तारीफ़ की बात है पर जब बच्चे बड़े हो जाएँ अपने पैरों पर खड़े हो जाएँ और अपना घर बसा लें तो अगर शरीके हयात ज़ुल्म या खयानत करता हो तो अलग हो जाने में ही भलाई है। नेकी का तक़ाज़ा यह है कि ऐसे मर्द अपनी बीवी के लिए और ऐसी औरत अपने शौहर के लिए पहले शरीके हयात का आगे बढ़ कर इंतज़ाम कर दे। बचपन से जवानी और अब अ...
Post a Comment
Read more